Abstracts – Browse Results
Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 10 results ...
Ansell, M, Holmes, M, Evans, R, Pasquire, C and Price, A (2009) Delivering Best Value in Highways Major Maintenance Schemes: Case Study. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(04), 235–45.
Dikmen, I, Birgonul, M T and Budayan, C (2009) Strategic Group Analysis in the Construction Industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(04), 288–97.
Goodrum, P M, Zhai, D and Yasin, M F (2009) Relationship between Changes in Material Technology and Construction Productivity. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(04), 278–87.
Lucko, G (2009) Productivity Scheduling Method: Linear Schedule Analysis with Singularity Functions. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(04), 246–53.
Sawhney, A, Walsh, K D, Bashford, H H and Palaniappan, S (2009) Impact of Inspected Buffers on Production Parameters of Construction Processes. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(04), 319–29.
Shapira, A and Simcha, M (2009) AHP-Based Weighting of Factors Affecting Safety on Construction Sites with Tower Cranes. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(04), 307–18.
- Type: Journal Article
- Keywords: Construction sites; Cranes; Hazards; Safety; Quantitative analysis;
- ISBN/ISSN: 0733-9364
- URL: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2009)135:4(307)
- Abstract:
Aspiring to adopt a nonstatistical quantitative approach to safety assessment, this study implements a multiattribute decision-making tool to elicit knowledge from experts and formalize it into a set of weighted safety factors. The environment addressed is the construction site and the specific factors studied are those affecting safety due to the operation of tower cranes. Nineteen senior construction equipment and safety experts were interviewed and led through the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to provide their assessments on the relative importance of safety factors obtained in an earlier study. The results accentuate the dominance of the crane operator and general superintendent on the site safety scene and play down the contribution of “classic” site hazards such as power lines. Quantitative measuring of safety, such as reflected in the weights obtained in this study, is important in communicating safety requirements and focusing the limited resources available for safety improvements. These factor weights are also deemed to be a vital component in the development of a comprehensive model that will allow the computation of safety indices for individual construction sites employing tower cranes. It is expected that the methodology can then be adopted for addressing other site safety issues as well.
Sobeih, T, Salem, O, Genaidy, A, Abdelhamid, T and Shell, R (2009) Psychosocial Factors and Musculoskeletal Disorders in the Construction Industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(04), 267–77.
Surahyo, M and El-Diraby, T E (2009) Schema for Interoperable Representation of Environmental and Social Costs in Highway Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(04), 254–66.
Tuholski, S J, Gursel, A P, Tommelein, I D and Bomba, G (2009) “Lean” Comparison Using Process Charts of Complex Seismic Retrofit Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(04), 330–9.
Wu, M and Lo, H (2009) Optimal Strategy Modeling for Price-Time Biparameter Construction Bidding. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(04), 298–306.